Saturday, October 17, 2015

Blog Talk: In Which I Discuss How Blog Assignments Like This Can Bring Up Sprinkles of Post-Process Theory and "Diving In" Into Everyday Generalized First Year Writing (Wanted: One Shorter and Snappier Blog Title)


One big assignment that I’ve considered including in my syllabus carried the post-process thinking of Breuch’s article as well as Selfe’s idea on mapping through technology for discursive purposes. The assignment, which would be 10% of the final grade so as not to overshadow the brief assignments and essay writing of a composition course at Tech, would involve the same type of blog-writing that we’ve been doing for this whole semester. Only instead of having students make their own blogs, I would have them comment on their choices in a selection of 5-7 arguments and topics that I’d post on my blog each week. I got the idea from a government class that I took during my senior year of high school, where the instructor would set up a blog with different current events, and each week we as students would have to comment on at least one of the current events. Adapting such a weekly exercise meant for a political science class into the structure a First-Year Writing class would be less of a stretch than it sounds. I could upload articles on the craft of writing or articles on composition writing like the ones we’ve read all semester long, and then have students give 300-500 word comments on what they think of the argument or how the articles could be applied to their own experiences with composition writing. Also, unlike the more structured brief assignment writing expected from RaiderWriter people, the blog comments would allow students to write in any subjective or objective form that they feel comfortable in writing. The goal of this assignment would be to dive into student opinions on composition writing, as well as get to know the students and their writing styles that go beyond the more generalized process-theory style writing.

            Of course, I would discourage them from typing in text speech or emoticons, since I’d state as a restriction to “be legible” with the comments. At the same time, I’d encourage multinational students to write in a language they are comfortable with while still helping them with making their English translations have the same voice as their more comfortable native writings. But that last part is still a work-in-progress, and I’d be welcome to any ideas on how Selfe’s interface mapping can be applied to multinational students. All that aside, the blogging exercise that I’ve cannibalized from similar weekly blog assignments works best for balancing more modern post-process theory ideas with the generalized writing process that’s been applied to our first-year writing classes now. The blog process that we’ve been doing all semester long, for instance, helps give us a gateway to express our own opinions without really being restricted to process theory techniques. The blog exercise in my syllabus likewise gives my theoretical composition students an opportunity to think outside the box, which can help them establish a definitive writing style without reliance on things like Engfish. That way, students can experience post-process ideas that can be used in developing effective compositions while still following Tech's First Year Writing program's generalized writing process in some form.

5 comments:

  1. Hey Kevin,
    I thought this was a pretty interesting assignment. You might consider doing a dry run where students comment on your blog posts and a dry run where students are permitted to create their own and comment on others for another class you teach.
    I was in an online EDD program for some time which had "Netiquette" for online interactions, blogs, responses to other's posts. I thought you might like it to tweak for your own purposes. It does allow for emoticons in order to clarify certain things that are difficult to communicate through written text. Here goes:

    Netiquette (Internet Etiquette)
    In order to avoid the pitfalls of ambiguity in written online conversation, pay attention to the following
    principles…
    ● Make sure your communications have a meaningful subject line and end with your name.
    People need to be able to ascertain quickly what an email or other communication is about
    and who it is from. The signature also indicates to the reader that the entire message was
    delivered.
    ● Clarify your own communication as much as possible (define potentially ambiguous words and
    phrases), and carefully edit your text before sending it for content as well as spelling,
    grammar, and punctuation.
    ● Use emoticons (emotional icons) to reduce ambiguity, but do not overuse them. The three
    most common are “;-)” (semi-colon-dash-right-parenthesis - the wink, meaning “I’m being a
    little mischievous”), “:-)” (colon-dash-right-parenthesis - the smiley, meaning “I’m smiling as I
    write this”), and “:-(“ (colon-dash-left-parenthesis - the frown, meaning “I’m disappointed
    about what I’m writing”).
    ● Seek to communicate as diplomatically as possible, including the manner in which you use
    humor.
    ● Ask open-ended questions when you start feeling defensive.
    ● When using written communication in a potentially stressful conversation, “sit” on your
    responses a while before sending them.
    ● Keep personal communications personal. Avoid copying personal messages from a personal
    environment to a more public one without permission.
    ● Avoid using CAPITAL LETTERS unless you literally mean to be SHOUTING. Emphasize words
    using italics or *paired stars* instead.
    ● Only use abbreviations or acronyms if you take the time to define them.
    ● Remember that good communication is good communication, no matter what medium you
    choose to use. So the same sorts of principles that will make you successful in traditional
    letter-writing or formal paper-writing will also help make you successful when writing text
    online.

    Mary D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Kevin,
    I thought this was a pretty interesting assignment. You might consider doing a dry run where students comment on your blog posts and a dry run where students are permitted to create their own and comment on others for another class you teach.
    I was in an online EDD program for some time which had "Netiquette" for online interactions, blogs, responses to other's posts. I thought you might like it to tweak for your own purposes. It does allow for emoticons in order to clarify certain things that are difficult to communicate through written text. Here goes:

    Netiquette (Internet Etiquette)
    In order to avoid the pitfalls of ambiguity in written online conversation, pay attention to the following
    principles…
    ● Make sure your communications have a meaningful subject line and end with your name.
    People need to be able to ascertain quickly what an email or other communication is about
    and who it is from. The signature also indicates to the reader that the entire message was
    delivered.
    ● Clarify your own communication as much as possible (define potentially ambiguous words and
    phrases), and carefully edit your text before sending it for content as well as spelling,
    grammar, and punctuation.
    ● Use emoticons (emotional icons) to reduce ambiguity, but do not overuse them. The three
    most common are “;-)” (semi-colon-dash-right-parenthesis - the wink, meaning “I’m being a
    little mischievous”), “:-)” (colon-dash-right-parenthesis - the smiley, meaning “I’m smiling as I
    write this”), and “:-(“ (colon-dash-left-parenthesis - the frown, meaning “I’m disappointed
    about what I’m writing”).
    ● Seek to communicate as diplomatically as possible, including the manner in which you use
    humor.
    ● Ask open-ended questions when you start feeling defensive.
    ● When using written communication in a potentially stressful conversation, “sit” on your
    responses a while before sending them.
    ● Keep personal communications personal. Avoid copying personal messages from a personal
    environment to a more public one without permission.
    ● Avoid using CAPITAL LETTERS unless you literally mean to be SHOUTING. Emphasize words
    using italics or *paired stars* instead.
    ● Only use abbreviations or acronyms if you take the time to define them.
    ● Remember that good communication is good communication, no matter what medium you
    choose to use. So the same sorts of principles that will make you successful in traditional
    letter-writing or formal paper-writing will also help make you successful when writing text
    online.

    Mary D

    ReplyDelete
  3. At first, I was skeptical of this assignment. I thought, "If the instructor finds the articles or issues, how is this teaching the students anything?" Reading on, I realized there is value in only requiring students to respond rather than curate/research:
    1) You avoid the excuse of "I didn't have time" and the possibility of marginally interesting/important content due to laziness.
    2) You teach students, indirectly, the value in reading multiple perspectives on a single issue.

    I'm still wondering, though, what the assessable goal of this assignment would be. What are students supposed to learn about writing from this exercise? How would you grade their responses, if at all?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kevin, I like the title. It sets the mood for the upcoming discussion, so I think it works. I also like the assignment because it gives students an opportunity to discuss something or some things in various tones outside the framework of the academic essay. One nice thing about having students work outside that framework is you get to see their writing -- I'm not so sure it's uncommon for students to not do their own work in a program where there's no way for the instructors to assess their own authentic writing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Have you had a chance to review others' syllabi yet? I'm going to make them available through our class site soon. I wonder if reviewing what your peers have to say about syllabi might be useful for your own thinking, too.

    ReplyDelete